Sunday, December 30, 2018

Any opinions of Fort Scott Munitions?


So they’re the folks with the “our ammo doesn’t expand, it tumbles” approach. And yeah, I know, knee-jerk response is to dismiss it as a gimmick. But, once in a blue moon, something new comes out and it has merit. Also see: shootingthebull410’s review of the Polycase Inceptor ARX in .380 and 9mm.So I’d guess the benefit here - if there is one - is that the bullet cannot be impeded by essentially any barrier or clothing because it creates a similar or better wound channel as a traditional hollow point without the possibility of running into the traditional JHP Achilles heel(s). Sounds neat. Assuming it tumbles as designed within the target and assuming the tumbling creates a similar or better wound channel, we have a winner. Right?A cursory YouTube gel test search shows promising results, presumably by non-biased third parties. Here’s one comparative test: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GgG4aKhUl14Anyone have thoughts? I’m currently happy with my tried and true Hornady Critical Defense 115gr, but it’s always fun to try new things if there’s merit to it. via /r/CCW http://bit.ly/2CFIVWN

No comments:

Post a Comment