I've been reading some comments about the recent decision by Fresh Farms and their request that people not brjng firearms (or other weapons) into their stores. I see a lot of remarks about Christian bakers and cakes, but I believe that's an apples and oranges argument. Shouldn't the real question be, if a company requests or prohibits my right to self-defense, how are they not responsible for providing for my physical safety while on the property? That's my opinion. You want to take away my force equalizer, you should be obligated to provide me with equivalent level of security. Am I way off? via /r/CCW http://ift.tt/1orBojD
No comments:
Post a Comment